[Chinese expert consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gut microecology in chronic constipation (2024 edition)].

Chronic constipation is one of the common gastrointestinal disorders, with an incidence rate that is gradually increasing yearly and becoming an important chronic disease that affects people's health and quality of life. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the basic and clinical research of chronic constipation, especially the gut microbiota therapy methods have received increasing attention. Therefore, under the initiative of the Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Society for the Promotion of Human Health Science and Technology, and Committee on Gut Microecology and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, experts from relevant fields in China have been organized to establish the "Chinese Expert Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Gut Microecology in Chronic Constipation (2024 Edition)" committee. Focusing on the dysbiosis of gut microbiota, the indications for gut microbiota therapy, and the protocols for fecal microbiota transplantation, 16 consensus opinions were proposed based on the review of domestic and international literature and the clinical experience of experts, aiming to standardize the clinical application of gut microbiota in chronic constipation.

CONSTIPATION SCORING SYSTEM VALIDATED FOR THE PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE (ÍNDICE DE GRAVIDADE DA CONSTIPAÇÃO INTESTINAL): IS IT RELIABLE IN ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF INTESTINAL CHRONIC CONSTIPATION IN OUR POPULATION?

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of valid and specific tools to measure chronic constipation severity in Brazil. AIMS: To validate the Constipation Scoring System for Brazilian spoken Portuguese. METHODS: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation itself (reliability and convergent and divergent validation). Translation: definitive version from the original version's translation and evaluation by specialists. Cultural adaptation: score content analysis of the definitive version, as an interview to patients. Interobserver reliability: application by two researchers on the same day. Intraobserver reliability: same researcher at different times, in a 7-day interval. Divergent validation: non-constipated volunteers. Convergent validation: two groups, good response to clinical treatment and refractory to treatment. RESULTS: Cultural adaptation: 81 patients, 89% female, with mean age of 55 and seven years of schooling, and overall content validity index was 96.5%. Inter and intraobserver reliability analysis: 60 patients, 86.7% female, mean age of 56 and six years of schooling, and the respective intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.991 and 0.987, p<0.001. Divergent validation: 40 volunteers, 25 male, mean age of 49 years, and the mean global score was 2. Convergent validation of patients with good response to clinical treatment: 47 patients, 39 female, mean age of 60 and six years of schooling, and the pre- and post-treatment scores were 19 and 8, respectively (p<0.001). Convergent validation of refractory to clinical treatment patients: 75 patients, 70 female, mean age of 53 and seven years of schooling, and the global average score was 22. CONCLUSIONS: The Constipation Scoring System (Índice de Gravidade da Constipação Intestinal) validated for the Brazilian population is a reliable instrument for measuring the severity of intestinal chronic constipation.

Gastrointestinal manifestations seen in pediatric patients diagnosed with small fiber neuropathy.

OBJECTIVES: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) affects the fibers involved in cutaneous and visceral pain and temperature sensation and are a crucial part of the autonomic nervous system. Autonomic dysfunction secondary to SFN and autoimmune receptor antibodies is being increasingly recognized, and gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations include constipation, early satiety, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Enteric nervous system involvement may be a possible explanation of abnormal GI motility patterns seen in these patients. METHODS: Children suspected to have SFN based on symptoms underwent skin biopsy at the Child Neurology clinic at Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, which was processed at Therapath™ Neuropathology. SFN was diagnosed using epidermal nerve fiber density values that were below 5th percentile from the left distal leg (calf) as reported per Therapath™ laboratory. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were diagnosed with SFN. Retrospective chart review was performed, including demographic data, clinical characteristics, and evaluation. A majority of patients were white adolescent females. Autonomic dysfunction, including orthostasis and temperature dysregulation were seen in 61.5% of patients (p = 0.124). Somatosensory symptoms, including pain or numbness were seen in 85% of patients (p < 0.001). GI symptoms were present in 85% of patients (p < 0.001) with constipation being the most common symptom seen in 50% of patients. This correlated with the motility testing results. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with SFN commonly have GI symptoms, which may be the main presenting symptom. It is important to recognize and look for symptoms of small fiber neuropathy in children with refractory GI symptoms that may explain multisystemic complaints often seen in these patients.

The Effects of Combined Use of Linaclotide and Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder in Colonoscopy Preparation for Patients With Chronic Constipation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of linaclotide and polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte powder in patients with chronic constipation undergoing colonoscopy preparation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 260 patients with chronic constipation who were scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy. They were equally divided into 4 groups using a random number table: 4L PEG, 3L PEG, 3L PEG+L, and 2L PEG+L. The 4 groups were compared based on their scores on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Ottawa Bowel Preparation Quality Scale (OBPQS), adverse reactions during the bowel preparation procedure, colonoscope insertion time, colonoscope withdrawal time, detection rate of adenomas, and their willingness to repeat bowel preparation. RESULTS: In terms of the score of the right half of the colon, the score of the transverse colon, the total score using BBPS, and the total score using OBPQS, the 3L PEG (polyethylene glycol)+L group was superior to groups 3L PEG and 2L PEG+L ( P <0.05), but comparable to the 4L PEG group ( P >0.05). The incidence rate of vomiting was higher in the 4L PEG group than in the 2L PEG+L group ( P <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the insertion time of the colonoscope between the 4 groups. The colonoscope withdrawal time in the 3L PEG+L group was shorter than in groups 4L PEG and 3L PEG ( P <0.05) and comparable to that in the 4L PEG group ( P >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of adenoma detection among the 4 groups ( P >0.05). The 4L PEG group was the least willing of the 4 groups to undergo repeated bowel preparation ( P <0.05). CONCLUSION: The 3L PEG+L is optimal among the 4 procedures. It can facilitate high-quality bowel preparation, reduce the incidence of nausea during the bowel preparation procedure, and encourage patients to undertake repeated bowel preparation.

A comparison of the prevalence of dry mouth and other symptoms using two different versions of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System on an inpatient palliative care unit.

BACKGROUND: Symptom assessment is key to effective symptom management and palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Symptom prevalence and severity estimates vary widely, possibly dependent on the assessment tool used. Are symptoms specifically asked about or must the patients add them as additional symptoms? This study compared the prevalence and severity of patient-reported symptoms in two different versions of a multi-symptom assessment tool. In one version, three symptoms dry mouth, constipation, sleep problems were among those systematically assessed, while in the other, these symptoms had to be added as an "Other problem". METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included adult patients with advanced cancer at an inpatient palliative care unit. Data were collected from two versions of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): modified (ESAS-m) listed 11 symptoms and revised (ESAS-r) listed 9 and allowed patients to add one "Other problem". Seven similar symptoms were listed in both versions. RESULTS: In 2013, 184 patients completed ESAS-m, and in 2017, 156 completed ESAS-r. Prevalence and severity of symptoms listed in both versions did not differ. In ESAS-m, 83% reported dry mouth, 73% constipation, and 71% sleep problems, but on ESAS-r, these symptoms were reported by only 3%, 15% and < 1%, respectively. Although ESAS-r severity scores for these three symptoms were higher than on ESAS-m, differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: We identified significant differences in patient symptom reporting based on whether symptoms like dry mouth, obstipation and sleep problems were specifically assessed or had to be added by patients as an "Other problem".

Comparing the short-term clinical outcomes and therapeutic effects of different colectomies in patients with refractory slow-transit constipation in eastern countries: a network meta-analysis.

Surgical treatment has been widely used in patients with refractory slow transit constipation (RSTC). The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the effects of different colectomies on short-term postoperative complications and quality of life in patients with RSTC. Electronic literature searches were performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, WANFANG DATA, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials databases and were searched up to December 2022. Selected to compare the short-term clinical outcomes and quality of life of the treatment of RSTC. A random-effects Bayesian NMA was conducted to assess and rank the effectiveness of different surgical modalities. This study included a total of six non-randomized controlled trials involving 336 subjects. It was found that subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (CRA) demonstrated superior effectiveness in several aspects, including reduced hospital stay (MD 0.06; 95% CI [0.02, 1.96]), shorter operative time (MD 4.75; 95% CI [0.28, 14.07]), lower constipation index (MD 0.61; 95% CI [0.04, 1.71]), improved quality of life (MD 4.42; 95% CI [0.48, 4.42]). Additionally, in terms of short-term clinical outcomes, subtotal colectomy with ileosigmoidal anastomosis (SC-ISA) procedure ranked the highest in reducing small bowel obstruction (OR 0.24; 95% CI [0.02, 0.49]), alleviating abdominal pain (OR 0.53; 95% CI [0.05, 1.14]), minimizing abdominal distension (OR 0.33; 95% CI [0.02, 0.65]), and reducing incision infection rates (OR 0.17; 95% CI [0.01, 0.33]). Furthermore, SC-ISA ranked as the best approach in terms of patient satisfaction (OR 0.66; 95% CI [0.02, 1.46]). Based on our research findings, we recommend that CRA be considered as the preferred treatment approach for patients diagnosed with RSTC.

Step on the accelerator: modern treatment of constipation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to explore effective management of constipation, examine challenges in making a positive diagnosis, and highlights the significance of a positive patient-provider relationship and emerging treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: Less than one-fifth of patients feel satisfied with treatment of their constipation. Sixty percent of patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis have severe to very severe constipation that correlates with their upper gastrointestinal symptom severity. Two gold kiwifruits are noninferior to 10 g of psyllium in the treatment of constipation. More than 40% of patients undergoing lumbar fusion continue to fill opioid prescriptions 90 days after surgery, contributing to 80 000 chronic opioid users annually. Most patients are using over-the-counter (OTC) treatments for constipation with greater than 60% dissatisfied. Pharmacologic management involves the use of GCC agonists and emerging drug classes such as bile acid transport inhibitors and sodium hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3) inhibitors. Nonpharmacologic treatments, including neuromodulation and FDA-approved vibrating capsule, show promise in improving symptoms and quality of life. SUMMARY: Constipation significantly impacts patients' quality of life and well being and the majority of patients are refractory to conservative measures and OTC treatments. Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments hold promise for improving constipation and quality of life.

Colorectal motility patterns and psychiatric traits in functional constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A study from China.

BACKGROUND: Functional constipation (FC) and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) represent a spectrum of constipation disorders. However, the majority of previous clinical investigations have focused on Western populations, with limited data originating from China. AIM: To determine and compare the colorectal motility and psychiatric features of FC and IBS-C in an Eastern Chinese population. METHODS: Consecutive chronic constipation patients referred to our motility clinic from December 2019 to February 2023 were enrolled. FC and IBS-C diagnoses were established using ROME IV criteria, and patients underwent high-resolution anorectal manometry (ARM) and a colonic transmit test using the Sitz marker study. Constipation-related symptoms were obtained through questionnaires. Anxiety and depression were assessed by the Hamilton anxiety rating scale and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21. The clinical characteristics and colorectal motility patterns of FC and IBS-C patients were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences in sex, age or abdominal discomfort symptoms were observed between IBS-C and FC patients (all P > 0.05). The proportion of IBS-C patients with delayed colonic transit was higher than that of patients with FC (36.63% vs 15.91%, P < 0.05), while rectosigmoid accumulation of radiopaque markers was more common in the FC group than in the IBS-C group (50% vs 26.73%, P < 0.05). Diverse proportions of these dyssynergic patterns were noted within both the FC and IBS-C groups by ARM. IBS-C patients were found to have a higher prevalence of depression than FC patients (66.30% vs 42.42%, P < 0.05). The scores for feelings of guilt, suicide, psychomotor agitation, diurnal variation, obsessive/compulsive disorder, hopelessness, self-abasedment and gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly higher in IBS-C patients than that in FC patients (P < 0.05). For IBS-C (χ2 = 5.438, P < 0.05) but not FC, patients with normal colon transit time were significantly more likely to have anxiety than those with slow colon transit time. For IBS-C patients but not FC patients, the threshold of first constant sensation, desire to defecate and sustained urgency were all weakly correlated with the degree of anxiety (r = 0.414, r = 0.404, and r = 0.418, respectively, P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with a low threshold of desire to defecate among IBS-C patients with depression was lower than that in those without depression (69.6% vs 41.9%, χ2 = 4.054, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight both overlapping and distinctive patterns of colon transit, dyssynergic patterns, anorectal sensation, psychological distress, and associations of psychiatric and colorectal motility characteristics in FC and IBS-C patients in an Eastern Chinese population, providing valuable insights into the pathophysiological underpinnings of these disorders.

[Chinese surgical diagnosis and treatment consensus on slow transit constipation (2023 edition)].

In recent years, advancements have been made in both basic and surgical research of slow-transit constipation (STC). However, compelling references for surgeons in the clinical practice of STC have been lacking, particularly on preoperative evaluation and the choice of surgical procedures. In order to further standardize the diagnosis, assessment and surgical management of STC, Chinese Medical Doctor Association Anorectal Doctor Branch and its Functional Diseases Committee selected relevant experts in the field of STC surgery in China to form the Editorial and Review Committee of the Expert Consensus on Diagnosis, Evaluation and Surgical Management of STC in China. By meticulously reviewing relevant literature from both domestic and international sources and integrating the clinical expertise of the panel of experts, the committee has formulated 20 recommendations. These recommendations aim to establish standardized processes for surgical diagnosis and treatment of STC, ultimately elevating the overall diagnostic and therapeutic standards for STC across China.

Overcoming barriers to opioid-induced constipation management in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common adverse effect of opioid therapy. We aim to identify the main barriers hindering clinical recommendations implementation and propose consensus solutions to improve OIC control in cancer patients. METHODS: Following collaborative and prioritization techniques, a scientific committee generated statements addressing possible barriers to optimal OIC management (related to patients, health providers and health care system), and potential interventions to overcome these barriers. An expert panel of 36 oncologists assessed the statements to reach a consensus. RESULTS: The survey consisted of 70 statements. Consensus was reached on 12/45 items related to barriers (26.6%) and on 19/25 items about corrective interventions (76%). The panel considered that patients are unaware of the existence of a specific OIC treatment, and their information sources are highly variable and unreliable. Regarding health providers, the panel considered that the oncologists prioritize symptoms such as diarrhea, pain, anxiety, or other treatment toxicities, over constipation. Work overload and bureaucratic requirements were the main barriers related to health care system. Regarding potential interventions, best-rated proposals included specific training programs development for primary care physicians and nurses, and multiplatform informative resources development for patients and caregivers, including precisely written instructions about OIC recognition and management. Oncologists assessed positively measures aiming to improve coordination between primary care physicians and oncologists, and nursing consultations implementation. The panel considered useful the OIC treatment algorithms simplification. CONCLUSIONS: The expert panel identified the main barriers to optimal OIC management and suggested some feasible approaches to overcome these barriers.

Effectiveness and safety of botulinum neurotoxin for treating dyssynergic defecation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dyssynergic defecation (DD) is a common cause of chronic constipation. Owing to the lack of a comprehensive synthesis of available data on the effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) for treating DD, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to May 9, 2023. The outcomes comprise short-term and long-term symptom improvement, various anorectal function measurements, complications of fecal incontinence, and symptom improvement after repeated BoNT injections. A meta-analysis comparing BoNT injection with either surgery or biofeedback (BFB) therapy in treating DD was also conducted. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to identify possible moderator effects. We included five randomized controlled trials, seven prospective studies, and two retrospective observational studies. Short-term potential improvement in symptoms (event rate [ER], 66.4%; 95% CI, 0.513 to 0.783) was identified, but in the long-term (>12 months), this effect was decreased (ER, 38.2%; 95% CI, 0.267 to 0.511). Short-term improvements in objective anorectal physiologic parameters were also observed. Repeated BoNT injection was effective for patients with symptom recurrence. Subgroup analysis revealed enhanced long-term symptom improvement with high-dose BoNT, but this treatment also increased the risk of complications and recurrence compared with low doses. The effectiveness, complications, and recurrence of symptoms associated with BoNT injection and surgery did not differ significantly. BoNT injection significantly provided short-term symptom improvement but also heightened the risk of incontinence compared with BFB therapy. Our systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that BoNT could be beneficial for short-term symptom improvement in patients with DD, but this effect tended to decline 12 months after injection. Standardized BoNT intervention protocols remain warranted. Among the several treatments for DD, we concluded that BoNT injection is not inferior to other options considering its effectiveness in relieving symptoms, the associated complication development, and the risk of symptom recurrence.

Development and validation of a clinical score for early diagnosis of constipation in critically ill children.

Constipation affects almost 50% of critically ill pediatric patients and is related to their morbidity and mortality. However, little attention is paid to it and it is diagnosed late and when there are already complications. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a score to identify critically ill children with high risk of constipation 48 h after admission. A single center two phase-study was carried out; the first one (retrospective observational study) to develop the score and the second one to validate it in another prospective observational study. Children between 15 days of life and 18 years old admitted to the PICU for more than 3 days were included. Demographic and clinical data during the first 48 h after PICU admission were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis and ROC curves were used to develop and validate the score. Data from 145 patients (62.8% boys) with a mean age of 34.9 ± 7.3 months were used to develop the score. Independent factors identified to develop the score were: weight > 7 kg, admission to PICU after surgery, need of vasoconstrictors, doses of fentanyl ≥ 2 mcg/kg/h, and initiation of enteral nutrition later than 48 h after admission. Two cut-off values were identified to set low constipation risk (< 5.7 points) and high constipation risk (> 6.2 points). This score was validated in 124 patients showing a sensibility of 63.2%, specificity of 95.5% and a positive/negative predictive values (P/NPV) of 100% and 82.1% respectively to identify constipated patients. This is the first score to identify high constipation risk in critically ill children. This score is easy to apply, and internal validation has shown a PPV of 100%.

Characteristics of the Cajal interstitial cells and intestinal microbiota in children with refractory constipation.

BACKGROUND: Children with refractory constipation experience intense and persistent symptoms that greatly diminish their quality of life. However, the underlying pathophysiological mechanism responsible for this condition remains uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate characteristics of colonic motor patterns and interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) to refractory constipation children, as well as intestinal microbiota compositions. METHODS: Colonic manometry (CM) was conducted on a cohort of 30 patients with refractory constipation to assess colonic motility, and 7 of them underwent full-thickness colon biopsy specimens. Another 5 colonic specimens from nonconstipation patients were collected to identify the ICCs by immunohistochemistry. Fecal samples from 14 children diagnosed with refractory constipation and subjecting 28 age-matched healthy children to analysis using high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA. RESULTS: According to CM results, dividing 30 children with refractory constipation into 2 groups: normal group (n = 10) and dysmotility group (n = 20). Dysmotility subjects showed lower colonic motility. Antegrade propagating pressure waves, retrograde propagating pressure waves, and periodic colonic motor activity were common in normal subjects and rare in dysmotility subjects (32.7 ± 8.9 vs 20.7 ± 13.0/17 h, P < 0.05, 11.5 ± 2.3 vs 9.6 ± 2.3/17 h, P < 0.05, and 5.2 ± 8.9 vs 3.5 ± 6.8 cpm, P < 0.005, respectively), whereas periodic rectal motor activity was more common in dysmotility subjects (3.4 ± 4.8 vs 3.0 ± 3.1 cpm, P < 0.05). Dysmotility subjects exhibited a significantly greater number of preprandial simultaneous pressure waves compared to the normal subjects (32.3 ± 25.0 vs 23.6 ± 13.2/1 h, P < 0.005). Dysmotility subjects displayed a notable decrease in postprandial count of antegrade propagating pressure waves and high amplitude propagating pressure waves when compared to normal subjects (3.9 ± 2.9 vs 6.9 ± 3.5/1 h and 2.3 ± 1.5 vs 5.4 ± 2.9/1 h, respectively, P < 0.05). The number, distribution, and morphology of ICCs were markedly altered in refractory constipation compared children to the controls (P < 0.05). Children diagnosed with refractory constipation displayed a distinct dissimilarity in composition of their intestinal microbiota comparing with control group (P < 0.005). In genus level, Bacteroidetes represented 34.34% and 43.78% in the refractory constipation and control groups, respectively. Faecalibacterium accounted for 3.35% and 12.56%, respectively (P < 0.005). Furthermore, the relative abundances of Faecalibacterium (P < 0.005), Lachnospira (P < 0.05), and Haemophilus (P < 0.05) significantly decreased, whereas those of Parabacteroides (P < 0.05), Alistipes (P < 0.005), Prevotella_2 (P < 0.005), [Ruminococcus]_torques_group (P < 0.005), Barnesiella (P < 0.05), Ruminococcaceae_UCG-002 (P < 0.005), and Christensensenellaceae_R-7_group (P < 0.05) were markedly increased in children with refractory constipation. CONCLUSIONS: Dysmotility subjects showed lower colonic motility and an impaired postprandial colonic response. The decreased number and abnormal morphology of colonic ICCs may contribute to the pathogenesis of refractory constipation. Children with refractory constipation exhibited significant variations in microbiota composition across various taxonomic levels compared to the healthy control group. Our findings contribute valuable insights into pathophysiological mechanism underlying refractory constipation and provide evidence to support the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies for affected children.

Very early onset perinatal constipation: Can it be cow's milk protein allergy?

Delayed passage of meconium or constipation during the perinatal period is traditionally regarded as a signal to initiate further work up to evaluate for serious diagnoses such as Hirschsprung's disease (HD), meconium ileus due to Cystic Fibrosis, etc. The diagnosis of HD particularly warrants invasive testing to confirm the diagnosis, such as anorectal manometry or rectal suction biopsy. What if there was another etiology of perinatal constipation, that is far lesser known? Cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) is often diagnosed in infants within the first few weeks of life, however, there are studies that show that the CMPA allergen can be passed from mother to an infant in-utero, therefore allowing symptoms to show as early as day one of life. The presentation is more atypical, with perinatal constipation rather than with bloody stools, diarrhea, and vomiting. The diagnosis and management would be avoidance of cow's milk protein within the diet, with results and symptom improvement in patients immediately. Therefore, we discuss whether an alternative pathway to address perinatal constipation should be further discussed and implemented to potentially avoid invasive techniques in patients. This entails first ruling out CMPA with safe, noninvasive techniques with diet modification, and if unsuccessful, then moving forward with further diagnostic modalities.

Gastrointestinal Sensory Neuropathy and Dysmotility in Fabry Disease: Presentations and Effect on Patient's Quality of Life.

INTRODUCTION: Fabry disease is a rare multisystemic lysosomal disease resulting in variable manifestations of the gastrointestinal (GI), neurologic, cardiac, and renal systems. Whether GI manifestations are a result of gut dysmotility is undetermined. We aimed to explore GI manifestations in depth and their effect on patients with Fabry disease and to characterize gut motility. METHODS: We recruited adult patients with Fabry disease reporting GI manifestations. All patients answered a battery of questionnaires covering symptom severity, GI-specific quality of life, and effects of work/productivity and underwent a wireless motility capsule test to measure pan-gut motility. RESULTS: In 48 patients with Fabry disease, abnormal bowel habits and abdominal pain were the most common symptoms. Bloating, nausea, vomiting, and reflux were also prevalent. Neurologic manifestations were found in 95.8% of patients, along with their GI manifestations. Dysmotility was found in less than 35% of wireless motility capsule tests. Colon transit time was associated with constipation severity and Bristol Stool Scale. Several GI symptoms were associated with reduced quality of life, anxiety, and work/productivity, but not Fabry severity score. DISCUSSION: This is the largest study of GI manifestations in patients with Fabry disease that characterizes gut motility. We found little association between GI manifestations and motility indices, suggesting that visceral hypersensitivity may be a major driver of symptoms. GI symptoms affect different aspects of patients' lives, yet are not always well-discussed or optimally managed in Fabry disease. Disease severity scores when used for therapeutic decision making do not often include GI symptoms or their impact.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Evaluation and Management of Belching, Abdominal Bloating, and Distention: Expert Review.

DESCRIPTION: Belching, bloating, and abdominal distention are all highly prevalent gastrointestinal symptoms and account for some of the most common reasons for patient visits to outpatient gastroenterology practices. These symptoms are often debilitating, affecting patients' quality of life, and contributing to work absenteeism. Belching and bloating differ in their pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management, and there is limited evidence available for their various treatments. Therefore, the purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update is to provide best practice advice based on both controlled trials and observational data for clinicians covering clinical features, diagnostics, and management considerations that include dietary, gut-directed behavioral, and drug therapies. METHODS: This Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These best practice advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature based on clinical trials, the more robust observational studies, and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these best practice advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinical history and physical examination findings and impedance pH monitoring can help to differentiate between gastric and supragastric belching. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Treatment options for supragastric belching may include brain-gut behavioral therapies, either separately or in combination, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, diaphragmatic breathing, speech therapy, and central neuromodulators. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Rome IV criteria should be used to diagnose primary abdominal bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Carbohydrate enzyme deficiencies may be ruled out with dietary restriction and/or breath testing. In a small subset of at-risk patients, small bowel aspiration and glucose- or lactulose-based hydrogen breath testing may be used to evaluate for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Serologic testing may rule out celiac disease in patients with bloating and, if serologies are positive, a small bowel biopsy should be done to confirm the diagnosis. A gastroenterology dietitian should be part of the multidisciplinary approach to care for patients with celiac disease and nonceliac gluten sensitivity. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Abdominal imaging and upper endoscopy should be ordered in patients with alarm features, recent worsening symptoms, or an abnormal physical examination only. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Gastric emptying studies should not be ordered routinely for bloating and distention, but may be considered if nausea and vomiting are present. Whole gut motility and radiopaque transit studies should not be ordered unless other additional and treatment-refractory lower gastrointestinal symptoms exist to warrant testing for neuromyopathic disorders. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: In patients with abdominal bloating and distention thought to be related to constipation or difficult evacuation, anorectal physiology testing is suggested to rule out a pelvic floor disorder. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: When dietary modifications are needed (eg, low-fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols diet), a gastroenterology dietitian should preferably monitor treatment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Probiotics should not be used to treat abdominal bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Biofeedback therapy may be effective for bloating and distention when a pelvic floor disorder is identified. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Central neuromodulators (eg, antidepressants) are used to treat bloating and abdominal distention by reducing visceral hypersensitivity, raising sensation threshold, and improving psychological comorbidities. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Medications used to treat constipation should be considered for treating bloating if constipation symptoms are present. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Psychological therapies, such as hypnotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and other brain-gut behavior therapies may be used to treat patients with bloating and distention. BEST PRACTICE 15: Diaphragmatic breathing and central neuromodulators are used to treat abdominophrenic dyssynergia.

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings in functional constipation and irritable bowel syndrome diagnosed using the Rome IV criteria: a cross-sectional survey during a medical check-up in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The Rome IV criteria have been established as an international standard for diagnosing disorders of gut-brain interaction. In this study, we aimed to examine the upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic findings and symptoms of subjects with functional constipation (FC) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) of individuals undergoing a medical check-up. METHODS: A total of 13,729 subjects underwent a medical check-up at Osaka City University-affiliated clinic, MedCity21, between April 2018 and March 2019. Among the 5,840 subjects who underwent screening upper GI endoscopy and completed a questionnaire based on the Rome IV criteria, 5,402 subjects were consecutively enrolled after excluding subjects with a large amount of gastric residue (n = 6), those who had previously undergone partial or total gastrectomy (n = 40), or those with daily use of low-dose aspirin (n = 82), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 63), or acid secretion inhibitors (n = 308). RESULTS: Robust Poisson regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, Helicobacter pylori infection status, alcohol intake, and smoking habits showed a significant association between FC and corpus erosion (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-5.67; p < 0.01) and red streaks (aPR, 3.83; 95% CI, 2.53-5.79; p < 0.01), whereas IBS was significantly associated with erosive gastritis (aPR, 8.46; 95% CI, 4.89-14.67; p < 0.01) and duodenitis (aPR, 7.28; 95% CI, 3.64-14.59; p < 0.01). Red streaks tended to be associated with IBS (aPR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.00-3.83; p = 0.05). Subjects with IBS were the most to complain of both upper and lower GI symptoms and psychological symptoms, followed by those with FC and controls. IBS subjects with erosive gastritis or duodenitis had significantly more complaints of stomachache and feeling stressed than those without erosive gastritis or duodenitis (54.5% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.03 and 66.7% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with FC and IBS had a variety of upper GI and psychological symptoms. In the upper GI endoscopic findings, corpus erosion and red streaks were associated with FC, and erosive gastritis, duodenitis, and possibly red streaks were associated with IBS.

Diferencias en la duración del reflejo rectoanal inhibitorio en pacientes con constipación funcional refractaria y mielomeningocele / Differences in rectoanal inhibitory reflex duration between patients with refractory functional constipation and myelomeningocele

Introducción. Habitualmente, durante la manometría anorrectal, en lo correspondiente al reflejo rectoanal inhibitorio (RRAI) solo se pesquisa su presencia o ausencia. Estudios han reportado que su análisis detallado puede brindar datos de interés. Nuestra hipótesis es que la medición del RRAI puede dar información para reconocer causas orgánicas (médula anclada, lipoma, etc.) en pacientes en los que previamente se consideró como de causa funcional. Objetivos. Comparar la duración del reflejo rectoanal inhibitorio en la manometría anorrectal de pacientes con constipación funcional refractaria (CFR) y mielomeningocele (MMC). Población y métodos. Estudio observacional, transversal, analítico (2004-2019). Pacientes constipados crónicos con incontinencia fecal funcional y orgánica (mielomeningocele). Se les realizó manometría anorrectal con sistema de perfusión de agua y se midió la duración del RRAI con diferentes volúmenes (20, 40 y 60 cc). Grupo 1 (G1): 81 CFR. Grupo 2 (G2): 54 MMC. Se excluyeron pacientes con retraso madurativo, esfínter anal complaciente, agenesia sacra y aquellos no colaboradores. Resultados. Se incluyeron 135 sujetos (62 varones). La mediana de edad fue G1:9,57 años; G2: 9,63 años. Duración promedio G1 vs. G2 con 20 cc: 8,89 vs. 15,21 segundos; con 40 cc: 11.41 vs. 21,12 segundos; con 60 cc: 14,15 vs. 26,02 segundos. La diferencia de duración del RRAI entre ambos grupos con diferentes volúmenes fue estadísticamente significativa (p = 0,0001). Conclusión. La duración del RRAI aumenta a mayor volumen de insuflación del balón en ambas poblaciones. Pacientes con MMC tuvieron mayor duración del RRAI que aquellos con CFR. En los pacientes con RRAI prolongado, debe descartarse lesión medular.

Introduction. Usually, during anorectal manometry, only the presence or absence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is investigated. Studies have reported that a detailed analysis may provide data of interest. Our hypothesis is that RAIR measurement may provide information to detect organic causes (tethered cord, lipoma, etc.) in patients in whom a functional cause had been previously considered. Objectives. To compare RAIR duration in anorectal manometry between patients with refractory functional constipation (RFC) and myelomeningocele (MMC). Population and methods. Observational, analytical, cross-sectional study (2004­2019). Patients with chronic constipation and functional and organic fecal incontinence (myelomeningocele). The anorectal manometry was performed with a water-perfused system, and the duration of RAIR was measured with different volumes (20, 40, and 60 cc). Group 1 (G1): 81 RFC. Group 2 (G2): 54 MMC. Patients with developmental delay, compliant anal sphincter, sacral agenesis and non-cooperative patients were excluded. Results. A total of 135 individuals were included (62 were male). Their median age was 9.57 years in G1 and 9.63 years in G2. Average duration in G1 versus G2 with 20 cc: 8.89 versus 15.21 seconds; 40 cc: 11.41 versus 21.12 seconds; 60 cc: 14.15 versus 26.02 seconds. The difference in RAIR duration with the varying volumes was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). Conclusion. RAIR duration was longer with increasing balloon inflation volumes in both populations. RAIR duration was longer in patients with MMC than in those with RFC. Spinal injury should be ruled out in patients with prolonged RAIR.